Last update: October 1998
The most recent version of this paper you could find at its original location
|
It had sixteen 16-bit registers, which could be accessed as thirty-two 8 bit registers, and an accumulator D used for arithmetic and memory access - memory to D, then D to registers, and vice versa, using one 16-bit register as an address. This led to one person describing the 1802 as having 32 bytes of RAM and 65535 I/O ports. A 4-bit control register P selected any one general register as the program counter, while control registers X and N selected registers for I/O Index, and the operand for current instruction. All instructions were 8 bits - a 4-bit op code (total of 16 operations) and 4-bit operand register stored in N.
There was no real conditional branching (there were conditional skips which could implement it, though), no subroutine support, and no actual stack, but clever use of the register set allowed these to be implemented - for example, changing P to another register allowed jump to a subroutine. Similarly, on an interrupt P and X were saved, then R1 and R2 were selected for P and X until an RTI restored them.
A later version, the 1805, was enhanced, adding several Forth language primitives (Forth is commonly used in control applications).
The use of the ISAR register allowed a subroutine to be entered without saving a bunch of registers, speeding execution - the ISAR would just be changed. Special purpose registers were stored in the second cell (regs 9-15), and the first eight registers were accessed directly (globally).
The windowing concept was useful, but only the register pointed to by the ISAR could be accessed - to access other registers the ISAR was incremented or decremented through the window.
Fairchild ended up as part of National Semiconductor, before being spun off again in 1997.
The unique feature was the ability to completely share a system bus with other processors. Most processors of the time assumed they were the only ones accessing memory or I/O devices. Multiple SC/MPs (as well as other intelligent devices, such as DMA controllers) could be hooked up to the bus. A control line (ENOUT (Enable Out) to ENIN) could be chained along the processors to allow cooperative processing. This was very advanced for the time, compared to other CPUs, but the bit-serial CPU was slow (even simple instruction took 5-7 cycles, while memory access was 2 cycles, which allowed them to share a memory bus without saturating it, as opposed to a 6502 which could share memory with at most one other CPU, and only then because of the way the CPU clock was used). However this feature was almost never used for multiprocessing.
In addition to I/O ports like the 8080, the SC/MP also had instructions and one pin for serial input and one for output.
National Semiconductor eventually replaced the SCMP with the COP4 (4 bit) and COP8 (8 bit) embedded controllers, with only two index registers, but adding stack support.
The unique feature of the F100-L was that it had a complete control bus available for a coprocessor that could be added on. Any instruction the F100-L couldn't decode was sent directly to the coprocessor for processing. Applications for coprocessors at the time were limited, but the design is still used in some modern processors, such as the National Semiconductor 320xx series (the predecessor of the Swordfish processor, described later), which included FPU, MMU, and other coprocessors that could just be added to the CPU's coprocessor bus in a chain. Other units not foreseen could be added later.
Ferranti, which built the Ferranti Mark 1 (Britain's first commercial electronic computer), no longer makes microprocessors.
The ALU chip contained twenty six 8 bit registers and an 8 bit ALU, while the control unit supervised the moving of data, memory access, and other control functions. The ROM allowed the chip to function as either an 8 bit chip or 16 bit, with clever use of the 8 bit ALU. Even more, microcode allowed the addition of floating point routines (40 + 8 bit format), simplifying programming (and possibly producing a Floating Point Coprocessor).
Two standard microcode ROMS were available. This flexibility was one reason it was also used to implement the DEC LSI-11 processor as well as the WD Pascal Microengine.
The 6100 was a 12 bit processor, which had exactly three registers - the PC, AC (an accumulator), and MQ. All 2 operand instructions read AC and MQ, and wrote back to AC. It had a 12 bit address bus, limiting RAM to only 4K. Memory references were 7 bit (128 word) offset either from address 0, or the PC.
It had no stack. Subroutines stored the PC in the first word of the subroutine code itself, so recursion wasn't possible without fancy programming.
4K RAM was pretty much hopeless for general purpose use. The 6102 support chip (included on chip in the 6120) added 3 address lines, expanding memory to 32K the same way that the PDP-8/E expanded the PDP-8. Two registers, IFR and DFR, held the page for instructions and data respectively (IFR always used until a data address was detected). At the top of the 4K page, the PC wrapped back to 0, so the last instruction on a page had to load a new value into the IFR if execution was to continue.
The PDP-8 itself was succeeded by the PDP-11 (though a version called the PDP-12 was produced, it was part of the PDP-8 series, not a replacement). The IMS 6120 was used in the DECmate (1980), DEC's original competition for the IBM PC, but lacked the processor and RAM capacity (a Z-80 or 8086 card could be added (reducing the 6120 to an I/O coprocessor) but lacked IBM PC compatability). DEC also tried competing with the 8086 based Rainbow, and the PDP-11 based PRO-325 personal computers, but none caught on.
Intersil was eventually bought by Harris Semiconductors, which produces versions of the 8088 and 8086, 1802, and 68HC05.
The NOVA had four 16-bit accumulators, AC0 to AC3. There were also 15-bit system registers - Program Counter, Stack pointer, and Stack Frame pointer (the last two were only on the MicroNova and Nova 3, not the original Nova or Fairchild CPU). AC2 and AC3 could be used for indexed addresses. Apart from the small register set, the NOVA was an ordinary CPU design.
Another CPU, the National Semiconductor PACE, was based on the NOVA design, but featured 16 bit addressing, more addressing modes, and a 10 level stack (like the 8008), but lacked hardware multiply and divide.
The 32 bit ECLIPSE (pre 1983) was Data General's successor to the 16 bit Nova. Like the Nova, the ECLIPSE had four 32 bit integer accumulators, added four stack registers, and four 64 bit floating point registers (in the MV series). There are twelve special purpose registers. The ECLIPSE was eventually implemented in a microprocessor form as well.
This has nothing to actually do with the Nova CPU, but is a little
bit interesting anyway.
It also had a subroutine stack of eight 15 bit elements, with no provision for spilling over into memory.
Signetics was bought by Valvo, which was later bought by Phillips.
The 8x300 could address sixteen registers, but some register addresses were used to specify non-register operations, so only eight 8-bit general purpose registers were available - R0 (AUX, the auxiliary register), R1 to R6, and R9. Register R8 was a single carry bit. In addition, an 8-bit I/O buffer register IVB was available, and is the only way to access data memory (similar to the D register in the RCA 1802) - all data was through 8-bit I/O ports, organised as two banks (left and right) of 256 each plus an address indicating which port of that bank I/O operations would use. The exact operation is specified by the source or destination register field - if it's not an actual register, then it signifies an operation. Ports could be attached directly to memory, or two ports could be used to generate an address, with another as a data buffer if more storage was needed.
The CPU consisted of multiple units strung together in a pipeline (one instruction at a time, no overlapping stages as in modern CPUs). The first operand could be taken from the IVB (as an I/O operation from an I/O port in the left or right bank) or any of the general registers, the second operand (if any) came from the AUX register. The first operand would be processed through a rotate unit, then a mask unit, to the ALU which performed ony four operations - MOV, ADD, AND and XOR. The result would be returned either to a general register, or could would be processed through a shifter and merge unit to the IVB register (and output to the appropriate left or right I/O port) - this would allow a subfield of the IVB to be replaced by bits from the result, instead of the whole register.
The design was also limited with no interrupt support, no stack or index registers (though the port addresses could function as such), and no subroutine support (the XEC instruction would execute an instruction without incremeting the PC, and could be used to implement subroutines). Data values couldn't be accessed from program memory.
It had only 16 pins, less than a typical RAM chip, and ran at 1 MHz.
|
Best viewed with Netscape Communicator
Last update: October 1998
The most recent version of this paper you could find at its original location